Cerebral Lateralizaton
Psy391h - Classes 19-20
(This page last updated 16 April 2006.)
Split-Brain Patients
- With corpus callosum cut, info cannot travel directly from one
hemisphere to the other.
- Picture flashed to right visual field.
- To visual cortex in left hemisphere
- Left hemisphere language mechanisms can name it.
- Picture flashed in left visual field.
- Right hemisphere cannot name it.
- Can identify it by pointing to matchin picture with left
hand.
- Simple signals such as emotions can travel from one cortex
through subcortical structures to the other.
- The biggest difference between the two hemispheres is in
language.
- In most people, the left hemisphere is capable of
understanding and producing language, including complex
sentences
- While the other hemisphere's language ability is more
limited.
- May be no language ability at all.
- May be able to use words.
- Cannot generate syntax.
- For all other cognitive tasks, both hemispheres are capable of
performing them, but there are some differences in relative
ability.
- Usually a right hemisphere advantage in visuospatial
processing
- chimeric faces
- Split-brain patients not aware that the two halves of the
stimulus do not match.
- Will name the face in the right visual field.
- Left hand can point to identify face in the left visual
field.
Differences in Global and Local Processing Between Left and Right
Hemispheres
- With these hierarchical stimuli, can report either local or
global letter.
- In split-brain patients, left hemisphere better at local task,
and right hemisphere better at global task.
- More evidence emerges from studying patients with left- and
right-hemisphere lesions.
- With left-hemisphere damage, slower to identify local
target.
- With right-hemisphere damage, slower to identify global
targets.
- Similar problems when left- and right-hemisphere patients
draw visual stimuli.
- Even normal subjects show left-hemisphere advantage for
location processing and right-hemisphere advantage for global
processing.
- Stimuli presented lateralized, too briefly for eye
movement.
- Searching for one of two targets (H or L) that can be at
either local or global level, or both.
Differences in Processing of Spatial Frequencies Between Left and
Right Hemispheres
- Spatial frequency in visual stimuli.
- Gratings with different spatial frequencies can be combined
to form more complex patterns.
- Each visual stimulus can be broken down into a set of
gratings such as these, each with a different orientation and
spatial frequency
- A picture with lots of fine detail will contain many high
spatial frequencies.
- A picture in which one broad area is lighter than another
broad area will contain low spatial frequencies.
- Most images hae a combination of high and low spatial
frequencies.
- We can remove just the high spatial frequencies, leaving
the low spatial frequencies.
- The result is like blurring the image.
- Or we can remove just the low spatial frequencies, leaving
the highs.
- Differences in processing spatial frequencies between
hemispheres could explain global-local differences.
- In normal subjects, right hemisphere better than right at
distinguishing gratings.
- More importantly, right advantage is greater for low
spatial frequency than for high.
- Right hemisphere may be better with global stimuli because
low spatial frequencies are used to identify them.
- Spatial Frequency Differences Could Also Explain Differences
in Face Perception
- Left hemisphere relatively better at identifying familiar
faces.
- Right hemisphere relatively better at distinguishing males
and females.
- Male/female discrimination can be done with low spatial
frequencies.
- Could explain why this task is well suited for right
hemisphere.
- Face identification requires high spatial frequencies.
- Could explain why this task is well suited for left
hemisphere.
Other Differences Between Left and Right Hemisphere
- Categorical vs. Coordinate Processing
- Right hemisphere advantage for coordinate, or metric,
judgments.
- Is dot near line or far from line?
- Left hemisphere advantage for categorical judgments.
- Is dot above or below line?
- Prototypes vs. Examplars
- Exemplars created by modifying prototypes.
- Learn category by viewing 4 exemplars.
- Do not see prototype during learning.
- Right hemisphere faster at identifying exemplars that were
seen previously.
- Left hemisphere faster at categorizing prototype with
correct exemplars.
- Right hemisphere may work more by recording many
exemplars.
- Left hemisphere may work more by generalizing across
exemplars to form prototype.
Attention and Recognition in Split Brain Patients
- Either hemisphere can direct attention to either visual
field.
- Visual search with split-brains
- Task: find target shape in array of distractors.
- For all subjects, response time goes up with display
size.
- Search rate twice as fast for split brains as for
normals.
- Each hemisphere can search its hemifield
independently.
- Recognition memory in split-brains.
- Each hemisphere sees its own series of shapes.
- At end of series, must decide if new shape has been seen
before.
- Much easier when same sequence is presented to both
hemispheres.
- Not able to attend and record memories for each hemifield
independently.
Probability Matching
- Predict whether stimulus will appear in upper or lower visual
field.
- In upper field on 80% of trials, and lower field on 20%.
- Human subjects usually use a matching strategy.
- Guess the top location 80% of the time, and the bottom
position 20% of the time.
- Rats and goldfish use a maximizing strategy.
- Always guess the location with the higher probability.
- The maximizing strategy produces higher accuracy.
- In split brain patients, the right hemisphere uses a
maximizing strategy.
- The left hemisphere uses a matching strategy.
- One explanation: The left hemisphere seeks a causal
explanation for the pattern, while the right hemisphere does not.
- Usually the causal explanation will lead to better
predictions, but not in this task.
- Left hemisphere seeks to build causal explanations in other
circumstances
- Anecdote: Chicken and shovel (see chapter 16)
next: executive
function

Psych 391h: Cognitive
Neuroscience
Kyle Cave
Psychology Dept.
U.
Mass.